Lump sum or dollar-cost averaging: which earns more
Got a sum of money at once (a bonus, a home sale, an inheritance) and want to invest it in stocks or funds? The classic question is whether to invest everything today or spread it over monthly purchases to avoid buying at the top.
When the lump sum wins
If the investment earns more than the account where the money waits, investing everything today keeps the money working longer. In the example, $30,000 in an investment earning 8% a year becomes $32,400 in 12 months; split into 12 purchases with the rest earning 4.5%, it ends at $31,908, $492 less.
When spreading out wins
If the price falls during the period, the monthly purchases catch lower prices. With a 20% decline, the lump sum ends at $24,000 and the monthly purchases at $27,152, with an average cost of $45.23 against $50 for the lump sum. In a dip followed by a recovery, the advantage of spreading out is even larger ($34,103 against $30,000).
Average cost
Because each purchase is the same amount, you buy more shares when the price is low and fewer when it is high. That is why your average cost sits below the simple average of the prices over the period.
How to decide
No one knows the scenario in advance. Spreading out works like insurance against regret: it costs a little when markets rise and protects a lot if prices fall right after you buy. Short periods, 6 to 12 months, balance the two.